Photo: TheBlaze.com (wp-content)
Why the left is winning and we're not
Discussion of political ideology, especially of differences,
is possibly one of the healthiest acts citizens of a free society can take part
in. Dissent, when rooted in truth and
justice, is an important ingredient in the makings of a patriot, but when those
dissentions between those who are more alike than different begin to allow the
destruction of a nation by the opposition, it becomes problematic.
In America, the Left keeps winning and the Right is in
danger of losing America beyond the point of rescue. Why?
Because we’ve all helped – well intentioned – but helped all the same.
The Right has helped the left towards America’s destruction
by doing what is normally a good thing, by simply being who we are and doing one of the things
that makes us better, but at some point it becomes damaging and should be done
behind closed doors and only on matters – to borrow a term from the religious
world – of salvation.
While the right-of-center (Republicans, conservatives, Tea
Party, Libertarians/libertarians, Constitutionalists etc.) were arguing internally
over who among them is to blame
for America’s problems, the Marxist fueled leftist propaganda machine – the
Democratic Party – was busy doing work and essentially taking over the
nation.
The left, as a body, lacks – to a large extent – what the
right prides itself in: the ability to use objective thought politically and
admit that it may not always be correct and the feeling that there is a need to
object and walk away from the flock, even if only figuratively and/or
temporarily. Why else would so many
long-standing members of the Republican Party all over the nation refer to
themselves as “conservative,” among other terms, when confronted with the
question of political leaning? This is
because they likely don’t agree with the undertakings of their party as a
whole.
On the battlefield –which
is exactly where we find ourselves – an army that bickers and causes low moral
within its own ranks is not going to win often because it is weak. Back in the barracks it is healthy to argue
the strategy of a plan, or debrief after a mission which may even include a
healthy argument or two, but on the battlefield in the public eye there must be
cohesion, AT LEAST on the truly important things about which we all agree: Gun rights, limited government, low taxes,
individual liberty/responsibility. Do we
not all agree on these most basic fundamentals?
Just as churches, clubs and other organizations often split while arguing everything from
what color the new building should be to what time service should be held, we
have found ourselves – the Right – creating our own little clubs arguing amongst ourselves, while the left has become a powerful movement of
team players working together to destroy the God-given liberties defined within
the Constitution and Bill of Rights. While we were bickering over whether the Labrador or Golden Retreiver is best, the left was busy outlawing dogs.
We can get back to healthy (and often necessary) arguments
in a few years, but for now our most basic of liberties are in grave danger of
becoming so far gone that they cannot be regained without the bloodshed of
future generations. I don’t want that
for my daughter, so I pledge to put away my differences on the more trivial
issues – no matter how passionate I may be – and to come together with others
on the Right to help preserve liberty for future generations NOW, while it’s
still possible. Will you also take that
pledge?
If we do it right, it may only be temporary. We can get back to arguing the fun stuff another day.
"Live Free or Die"
